|
"How Birds Fly" by: Nancy Marie Brown
(Research/Penn State, Vol. 17, no. 1 (March, 1996))
To stay high in the sky, birds filled their bones with air -- and
cut the air out of their genes, according to Penn State
biologists Austin and Marianne Hughes.
That birds have less DNA in their cells than mammals was
known. The question was, why? Was it an accident, a chance
mutation in a small group of ancestors millions of years ago? Or
did it evolve, providing modern birds with an unknown benefit?
"If there is some adaptive reason why birds have a reduced
genome size," Austin Hughes says, "it should be reflected in just
about every gene. We would expect to find that each gene sequence
is smaller -- not that a huge single chunk of DNA is missing."
Which is what the Hugheses found when they compared 31
chicken genes to similar human ones, zeroing in on segments of
genes known as introns. Introns -- sometimes called "junk DNA" --
mark the boundaries between the active, protein-coding bits of a
gene. "Introns basically just sit there," says Hughes, "so if you
were looking for a way to make the genome smaller, that would be
a good place to cut."
The researchers found that "small intron segments were
missing in every gene, which indicates to me," says Hughes, "that
there is some sort of overall pressure in the direction of
reducing the genome size in birds." That the best flyers, out of
40 families of birds ranked, also had the smallest genomes
suggested to the Hugheses that this adaptive pressure came from
the rigors of flight.
How could less DNA help birds fly? Smaller genes can mean
smaller cells, Hughes notes. "A good metabolism for flight
requires each cell to exchange carbon dioxide for oxygen really
fast, which is easier to do in a small cell because it has a
relatively large surface area." Gene replication would also be
faster.
To see if their hypothesis holds up, the Hugheses "next want
to compare the introns of other birds -- like a penguin, which
can't fly at all, and a hummingbird, which is a great flyer,"
says Austin Hughes. "It also would be great to do the same thing
with bats, which have less DNA than the average mammal."
Austin L. Hughes, Ph.D, is assistant professor of biology and
Marianne K. Hughes, Ph.D., is research associate in the Eberly
College of Science, 208 Mueller, University Park, PA 16802; 814-865-5013. This project was supported by the National Institutes
of Health and published in the October 5 issue of Nature.
Reported by Barbara K. Kennedy.
|