By Anna Hershenberg
"How can you study God scientifically?" I ask Grace O'Neill, an
undergraduate majoring in sociology and religious studies.
"How
can you not?" O'Neill responds playfully. She peers at me from behind
the short blonde tuft of hair that keeps falling into her eyes.
O'Neill's research suggests that the more important religion is
to an adolescent, the less likely that teen will participate in
risky behavior. But I'm a psychology major, and the scientist in
me is skeptical. Each person defines God and spirituality
and religion differently. How can you pin down such
an abstract, variable concept? More important, how can an experimenter
remain unbiased facing such an emotionally charged topic?
O'Neill agrees that it's tricky. "When you study social sciences,
you have to detach yourself from your subject but with something
like religion, it's virtually impossible. Everyone's really close
to religion, and each person has his or her own bias about it. It's
like politics." She pauses, settling contemplatively into her chair.
"But, religion is such an integral part of life and culture. Shying
away from it because of the difficulty of defining it doesn't make
sense."
When I pose the same question a week later to Karen Carver, O'Neill's
adviser and a professor of sociology at Penn State, she mirrors
O'Neill's conviction. "Only ten percent of people in America identify
themselves as atheists. That means 90 percent of people believe
in some sort of God. As a scientist, I can't discount that. Can
you?"
Other social scientists, Carver says, have already shown that being
spiritual can positively affect a person's health. For instance,
a fascinating double-blind experiment found that individuals who
were prayed for recovered faster from a variety of coronary traumas
than those not prayed for. "When I first heard about this, the social
scientist in me was not quite sure," O'Neill said. "But, the believer
in me thought, 'Wow, this is really interesting!'"
O'Neill and Carver are some of the first researchers to use the
newly available National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
("Add Health") to study religion. Add Health allowed them access
to questionnaires and interviews completed by 12,105 adolescents
in grades seven to 12. Carver and O'Neill selected the teens' responses
to questions dealing with religious attitudes and health. They created
a composite measure of "religiosity," looking at the questions asking
adolescents how important religion is to their life, how frequently
they attend church, and how frequently they prayed. "We got around
the problem of coming up with a universal definition of religion
because the teens could interpret the word 'religion' in the questions
however they wanted," O'Neill explains. She and Carver defined health
as self-rated general health, accident risk, homicide risk, and
suicide risk. They found that, in general, adolescents who were
more religious were healthier, regardless of how religious their
parents were.
Lifestyle choices and the social context around religion explain
a large portion of healthy outcomes. Because many religions have
specific rules about moderating drug and alcohol intake, religious
individuals tend to abuse substances less. Past research has shown
that people with social support groups are healthier, and religious
people are more likely to develop supportive networks. Increased
self-esteem is another possible link between religion and health.
If people have a positive outlook on life, they will be more likely
to take setbacks in stride.
Yet, in some cases, oddly, being religious actually increased a
teen's risky behavior. O'Neill and Carver found that adolescents
with religious parents were more likely to report driving under
the influence of drugs and alcohol. Another unusual finding shows
that the more religious a parent was, the less likely the adolescent
would wear a seat-belt. "Logic would say this is backward
but religious people tend to believe, 'If I'm going to die, I'm
going to die,'" O'Neill offers.
O'Neill and Carver hope that if they can pinpoint why religion
can sometimes lead to risky behaviors, they will be able to take
proactive measures to reduce the frequency of these occurrences.
And, that is a very good reason for studying God scientifically.
Grace O'Neill graduated in May 2000 with a B.A. in religious
studies and sociology from the College of the Liberal Arts. Her
research poster," The Effect of Religious Attitudes and Practices
on Adolescent Health," won first prize in the University's 1999
Undergraduate Research Fair in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
category. Her adviser is Karen Carver, Ph.D., assistant professor
of sociology, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802; 814-863-6398;
carver@pop.psu.edu. Writer
Anna Hershenberg graduated in May 2000 with a B.A. in English and
honors in psychology.